Review



ezrin mouse monoclonal antibody  (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank)


Bioz Verified Symbol Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank ezrin mouse monoclonal antibody
    a) <t>Ezrin</t> protein sequence: membrane binding FERM domain consists of three lobes – F1 (residues P2-P86), F2 (residues E87-G202), and F3 (residues I203-K296); linker region consists of residues P297-P496; and the actin-binding C-terminal domain (CTD) consists of residues T497-L586. b) AlphaFold 3.0 predicted closed-form structure of the full-length ezrin protein . In the predicted closed-form ezrin structure, C-terminal CTD domain interacts with FERM over the F2-F3 subdomain surface. c) System setup for the FERM-CTD structure (PDB ID: 4RM9) at a DOPC:DOPS:PIP 2 (80:16:4ratio) membrane that was used in the molecular dynamics simulations in this study. d) Number of PIP 2 head groups phosphorus atoms within 10 Å of any atoms in the residues in FERM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (α = 0.05) between the means of contact counts between 0-10 ns and 495-505 ns or 990-1000 ns, e) Aggregation of PIP 2 (orange), DOPS (blue) and DOPC (gray) phospholipids in a PIP 2 /DOPS/DOPC membrane at the F1-F3 surface of ezrin FERM domain at t = 1000 ns mark. f) Number of DOPS within 10 Å of the residues in FERM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (independent sample t-test, α=0.05) between the means of contact counts between 0-10 ns and 495-505 ns or 990-1000 ns. Double asterisk (**) indicates significant difference (ANOVA, α = 0.05) between the means in systems with DOPC/DOPS/PIP 2 membranes and DOPC/DOPS membranes in the 990-1000 ns interval. g) Aggregation of DOPS phospholipids (blue) in a DOPS/DOPC membrane at the F1-F3 surface of ezrin FERM domain at t = 1000 ns mark.
    Ezrin Mouse Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 35 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ezrin mouse monoclonal antibody/product/Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
    Average 94 stars, based on 35 article reviews
    ezrin mouse monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "On the Mechanism of Ezrin Activation"

    Article Title: On the Mechanism of Ezrin Activation

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.1101/2025.11.07.687285

    a) Ezrin protein sequence: membrane binding FERM domain consists of three lobes – F1 (residues P2-P86), F2 (residues E87-G202), and F3 (residues I203-K296); linker region consists of residues P297-P496; and the actin-binding C-terminal domain (CTD) consists of residues T497-L586. b) AlphaFold 3.0 predicted closed-form structure of the full-length ezrin protein . In the predicted closed-form ezrin structure, C-terminal CTD domain interacts with FERM over the F2-F3 subdomain surface. c) System setup for the FERM-CTD structure (PDB ID: 4RM9) at a DOPC:DOPS:PIP 2 (80:16:4ratio) membrane that was used in the molecular dynamics simulations in this study. d) Number of PIP 2 head groups phosphorus atoms within 10 Å of any atoms in the residues in FERM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (α = 0.05) between the means of contact counts between 0-10 ns and 495-505 ns or 990-1000 ns, e) Aggregation of PIP 2 (orange), DOPS (blue) and DOPC (gray) phospholipids in a PIP 2 /DOPS/DOPC membrane at the F1-F3 surface of ezrin FERM domain at t = 1000 ns mark. f) Number of DOPS within 10 Å of the residues in FERM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (independent sample t-test, α=0.05) between the means of contact counts between 0-10 ns and 495-505 ns or 990-1000 ns. Double asterisk (**) indicates significant difference (ANOVA, α = 0.05) between the means in systems with DOPC/DOPS/PIP 2 membranes and DOPC/DOPS membranes in the 990-1000 ns interval. g) Aggregation of DOPS phospholipids (blue) in a DOPS/DOPC membrane at the F1-F3 surface of ezrin FERM domain at t = 1000 ns mark.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a) Ezrin protein sequence: membrane binding FERM domain consists of three lobes – F1 (residues P2-P86), F2 (residues E87-G202), and F3 (residues I203-K296); linker region consists of residues P297-P496; and the actin-binding C-terminal domain (CTD) consists of residues T497-L586. b) AlphaFold 3.0 predicted closed-form structure of the full-length ezrin protein . In the predicted closed-form ezrin structure, C-terminal CTD domain interacts with FERM over the F2-F3 subdomain surface. c) System setup for the FERM-CTD structure (PDB ID: 4RM9) at a DOPC:DOPS:PIP 2 (80:16:4ratio) membrane that was used in the molecular dynamics simulations in this study. d) Number of PIP 2 head groups phosphorus atoms within 10 Å of any atoms in the residues in FERM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (α = 0.05) between the means of contact counts between 0-10 ns and 495-505 ns or 990-1000 ns, e) Aggregation of PIP 2 (orange), DOPS (blue) and DOPC (gray) phospholipids in a PIP 2 /DOPS/DOPC membrane at the F1-F3 surface of ezrin FERM domain at t = 1000 ns mark. f) Number of DOPS within 10 Å of the residues in FERM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (independent sample t-test, α=0.05) between the means of contact counts between 0-10 ns and 495-505 ns or 990-1000 ns. Double asterisk (**) indicates significant difference (ANOVA, α = 0.05) between the means in systems with DOPC/DOPS/PIP 2 membranes and DOPC/DOPS membranes in the 990-1000 ns interval. g) Aggregation of DOPS phospholipids (blue) in a DOPS/DOPC membrane at the F1-F3 surface of ezrin FERM domain at t = 1000 ns mark.

    Techniques Used: Sequencing, Membrane, Binding Assay

    a) Hydrogen bond counts between ezrin F2-CTD lobes (left) and ezrin F3-CTD lobes (right). Significantly more hydrogen bonds are broken in the system where ezrin has a phosphorylated T567 residue. b) Significant opening between CTD residues AA538-AA546 and FERM F2 lobe is only observed in the FERM-CTD system with phosphorylated T567 at a PIP 2 /DOPS/DOPC membrane. Left – crystal structure of ezrin FERM and C-ERMAD (PDB ID:4RM9). Right – distance between alpha carbon atoms of residue pairs K162-R542, Q160-K546, R156-T548 in the beginning of the equilibrated unbiased MD simulations (t=0 ns) and the end of the 1 µs simulation (t=1000 ns) for versions of the system that contain either a nonphosphorylated T567 (npT567, top) or phosphorylated T567 (pT567, bottom). b)-d) Distances of CTD residue Cα atoms from the Cα atoms of their nearest FERM F2-F3 residues. b) distances of CTD residues AA538-AA542 increase only for a system phosphorylated T567 at a PIP 2 /DOPS/DOPC membrane (red), c) large changes in distances are observed between Cα atoms of CTD helix H3 (residues AA549-AA559) and FERM F3 residues K230-T235 an CTD helix H3, d) no significant change in distance is observed between CTD helix H5 (residues T576-L586) and nearest FERM atoms. e) Coulombic potentials between CTD helices H1-H5 and nearest secondary structures in FERM F2-F3 lobes. Helices H1-H5 correspond to amino acid residues as follows: H1 – residues E525-Q540, H2 – residues A541-R547, H3 – residues H549-R559, H4 – residues K564-R572, H5 – residues T576-L586. Notation: pT567 – system with a phosphorylated T567, wt – system with a nonphosphorylated T567, soln – simulation carried out in a KCl solution. Asterisks (*) indicate a statistically significant coulombic attraction strength difference for a certain CTD helix between the FERM-CTD pT567 system at a PIP 2 /DOPC/DOPS membrane against any other systems. The inset provides a visualization of H1-H5 CTD helices in the crystal structure of closed state ezrin (PDB ID: 4RM9).
    Figure Legend Snippet: a) Hydrogen bond counts between ezrin F2-CTD lobes (left) and ezrin F3-CTD lobes (right). Significantly more hydrogen bonds are broken in the system where ezrin has a phosphorylated T567 residue. b) Significant opening between CTD residues AA538-AA546 and FERM F2 lobe is only observed in the FERM-CTD system with phosphorylated T567 at a PIP 2 /DOPS/DOPC membrane. Left – crystal structure of ezrin FERM and C-ERMAD (PDB ID:4RM9). Right – distance between alpha carbon atoms of residue pairs K162-R542, Q160-K546, R156-T548 in the beginning of the equilibrated unbiased MD simulations (t=0 ns) and the end of the 1 µs simulation (t=1000 ns) for versions of the system that contain either a nonphosphorylated T567 (npT567, top) or phosphorylated T567 (pT567, bottom). b)-d) Distances of CTD residue Cα atoms from the Cα atoms of their nearest FERM F2-F3 residues. b) distances of CTD residues AA538-AA542 increase only for a system phosphorylated T567 at a PIP 2 /DOPS/DOPC membrane (red), c) large changes in distances are observed between Cα atoms of CTD helix H3 (residues AA549-AA559) and FERM F3 residues K230-T235 an CTD helix H3, d) no significant change in distance is observed between CTD helix H5 (residues T576-L586) and nearest FERM atoms. e) Coulombic potentials between CTD helices H1-H5 and nearest secondary structures in FERM F2-F3 lobes. Helices H1-H5 correspond to amino acid residues as follows: H1 – residues E525-Q540, H2 – residues A541-R547, H3 – residues H549-R559, H4 – residues K564-R572, H5 – residues T576-L586. Notation: pT567 – system with a phosphorylated T567, wt – system with a nonphosphorylated T567, soln – simulation carried out in a KCl solution. Asterisks (*) indicate a statistically significant coulombic attraction strength difference for a certain CTD helix between the FERM-CTD pT567 system at a PIP 2 /DOPC/DOPS membrane against any other systems. The inset provides a visualization of H1-H5 CTD helices in the crystal structure of closed state ezrin (PDB ID: 4RM9).

    Techniques Used: Residue, Membrane

    a) Well-tempered metadynamics contact map collective variable can be successfully used to make the ezrin system undergo a full dissociation between FERM and CTD domains in about 20 ns. Image on the right is the schematic of how the contact map CV includes contacts across the entire surface of CTD and FERM F2-F3 lobes. b) The free energy surfaces of well-tempered contact map WTMetaD show that ezrin system with nonphosphorylated T567 has a mean barrier of 11.2 ± 0.3 kcal/mol for the transition from closed to dissociated FERM-CTD (blue) and a 3.2 ± 0.5 kcal/mol transition barrier between the closed and open states when the system has a phosphorylated T567 residue. The barrier of EBP50-FERM dissociation (11.7 ± 1.1 kcal/mol) is similar to that of FERM-wtCTD. Results are reported as mean (± SE) of sample free energy values corresponding to certain contact map collective variable values. The free energy profiles converged in 50-100 ns of the WTMetaD runs (Supplementary Figure S8). c) Ezrin FERM-CTD crystal structure (PDB ID: 4RM9). d) Crystal structure of ezrin FERM domain and EBP50 C-terminal residues (PDB ID: 1SGH). The C-terminal end of ezrin CTD domain has very similar alignment to F3 lobe of FERM as does the end helix of EBP50. e)-f) Distance between the C α atoms of different contact map pairs at contact map values 0.1-0.9 obtained from WTMetaD runs between F3 and CTD (e), and between F2 and CTD (f). Results in e)-f) are presented as mean distance and standard error for each of the contact map coordinate values collected from all WTMetaD simulation frames that have a contact map value in a certain range. g) RMSF plots for lobe F2 (left) and F3 (right) during the WTMetaD simulations for the system with phosphorylated T567 (red) and the system with nonphosphorylated T567 (blue).
    Figure Legend Snippet: a) Well-tempered metadynamics contact map collective variable can be successfully used to make the ezrin system undergo a full dissociation between FERM and CTD domains in about 20 ns. Image on the right is the schematic of how the contact map CV includes contacts across the entire surface of CTD and FERM F2-F3 lobes. b) The free energy surfaces of well-tempered contact map WTMetaD show that ezrin system with nonphosphorylated T567 has a mean barrier of 11.2 ± 0.3 kcal/mol for the transition from closed to dissociated FERM-CTD (blue) and a 3.2 ± 0.5 kcal/mol transition barrier between the closed and open states when the system has a phosphorylated T567 residue. The barrier of EBP50-FERM dissociation (11.7 ± 1.1 kcal/mol) is similar to that of FERM-wtCTD. Results are reported as mean (± SE) of sample free energy values corresponding to certain contact map collective variable values. The free energy profiles converged in 50-100 ns of the WTMetaD runs (Supplementary Figure S8). c) Ezrin FERM-CTD crystal structure (PDB ID: 4RM9). d) Crystal structure of ezrin FERM domain and EBP50 C-terminal residues (PDB ID: 1SGH). The C-terminal end of ezrin CTD domain has very similar alignment to F3 lobe of FERM as does the end helix of EBP50. e)-f) Distance between the C α atoms of different contact map pairs at contact map values 0.1-0.9 obtained from WTMetaD runs between F3 and CTD (e), and between F2 and CTD (f). Results in e)-f) are presented as mean distance and standard error for each of the contact map coordinate values collected from all WTMetaD simulation frames that have a contact map value in a certain range. g) RMSF plots for lobe F2 (left) and F3 (right) during the WTMetaD simulations for the system with phosphorylated T567 (red) and the system with nonphosphorylated T567 (blue).

    Techniques Used: Residue

    a) Coomassie staining of purified proteins isolated from either HEK-293T cells (LOK-GFP-Flag) or Bacterial expression (EBP50 constructs and Ezrin). b) Western blotting of biochemical in vitro kinase assays blotting for total Ezrin vs. Ezrin phosphorylated at T567 (pT567). Purified full length untagged Ezrin and LOK-GFP-Flag kinase and were added at a constant concentration 1.5mg/ml and 0.05mg/ml respectively. Prior to the addition of ATP, the proteins were incubated with 0.5mg/ml of EBP50 or EBP50 variants and PI(4,5)P 2 was either added or withheld from duplicates of each EBP50 condition. Mutations in the two PDZ domains activate EBP50 leading to constitutively active binding between EBP50 and Ezrin’s FERM domain while EBP50’s tail domain is an unregulated Ezrin FERM binding motif. Phosphorylation of Ezrin at pT567 was PI(4,5)P 2 dependent but independent from EBP50 binding. c) Western blotting of lysate from human WT Jeg-3 epithelial cells and Jeg-3 CRISPR knockouts of EBP50 and LOK/SLK. Cells were treated with either the phosphatase inhibitor Calyculin A (Cal. A), the kinase inhibitor Staurosporine (Staursp) or no treatment prior to lysing and blotted for total Ezrin vs. Ezrin phosphorylated at T567 (pT567). Cells lacking EBP50 have less pT567 than their WT counterparts. The effect of treatment with Cal. A or Staursp. is not altered in cells lacking EBP50 vs. WT cells indicating that EBP50 influences the turnover but not the capacity of phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of ezrin at T567. Cells lacking the endogenous ERM kinases LOK/SLK have no phosphorylation at T567.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a) Coomassie staining of purified proteins isolated from either HEK-293T cells (LOK-GFP-Flag) or Bacterial expression (EBP50 constructs and Ezrin). b) Western blotting of biochemical in vitro kinase assays blotting for total Ezrin vs. Ezrin phosphorylated at T567 (pT567). Purified full length untagged Ezrin and LOK-GFP-Flag kinase and were added at a constant concentration 1.5mg/ml and 0.05mg/ml respectively. Prior to the addition of ATP, the proteins were incubated with 0.5mg/ml of EBP50 or EBP50 variants and PI(4,5)P 2 was either added or withheld from duplicates of each EBP50 condition. Mutations in the two PDZ domains activate EBP50 leading to constitutively active binding between EBP50 and Ezrin’s FERM domain while EBP50’s tail domain is an unregulated Ezrin FERM binding motif. Phosphorylation of Ezrin at pT567 was PI(4,5)P 2 dependent but independent from EBP50 binding. c) Western blotting of lysate from human WT Jeg-3 epithelial cells and Jeg-3 CRISPR knockouts of EBP50 and LOK/SLK. Cells were treated with either the phosphatase inhibitor Calyculin A (Cal. A), the kinase inhibitor Staurosporine (Staursp) or no treatment prior to lysing and blotted for total Ezrin vs. Ezrin phosphorylated at T567 (pT567). Cells lacking EBP50 have less pT567 than their WT counterparts. The effect of treatment with Cal. A or Staursp. is not altered in cells lacking EBP50 vs. WT cells indicating that EBP50 influences the turnover but not the capacity of phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of ezrin at T567. Cells lacking the endogenous ERM kinases LOK/SLK have no phosphorylation at T567.

    Techniques Used: Staining, Purification, Isolation, Expressing, Construct, Western Blot, In Vitro, Concentration Assay, Incubation, Binding Assay, Phospho-proteomics, CRISPR, De-Phosphorylation Assay

    a)-b) Closed state ezrin is attracted to apical cell membranes due to highly negatively charged PIP 2 phospholipids. c) Upon attachment to membrane, FERM F1 and F3 subdomains recruit more PIP 2 . d) Ezrin wtCTD spontaneously dissociates from FERM over long timescales. e) Dissociation of CTD leaves space between FERM and CTD for LOK kinase to phosphorylate the T567 residue. f) Upon T567 phosphorylation, ezrin primarily remains in the open state due to the lower propensity to inhabit the closed state. g) CTD is enabled to float away and interact with actin filaments, thus leaving space for downstream FERM F2-F3 interactions with EBP50 or other cellular targets.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a)-b) Closed state ezrin is attracted to apical cell membranes due to highly negatively charged PIP 2 phospholipids. c) Upon attachment to membrane, FERM F1 and F3 subdomains recruit more PIP 2 . d) Ezrin wtCTD spontaneously dissociates from FERM over long timescales. e) Dissociation of CTD leaves space between FERM and CTD for LOK kinase to phosphorylate the T567 residue. f) Upon T567 phosphorylation, ezrin primarily remains in the open state due to the lower propensity to inhabit the closed state. g) CTD is enabled to float away and interact with actin filaments, thus leaving space for downstream FERM F2-F3 interactions with EBP50 or other cellular targets.

    Techniques Used: Membrane, Residue, Phospho-proteomics



    Similar Products

    94
    Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank ezrin mouse monoclonal antibody
    a) <t>Ezrin</t> protein sequence: membrane binding FERM domain consists of three lobes – F1 (residues P2-P86), F2 (residues E87-G202), and F3 (residues I203-K296); linker region consists of residues P297-P496; and the actin-binding C-terminal domain (CTD) consists of residues T497-L586. b) AlphaFold 3.0 predicted closed-form structure of the full-length ezrin protein . In the predicted closed-form ezrin structure, C-terminal CTD domain interacts with FERM over the F2-F3 subdomain surface. c) System setup for the FERM-CTD structure (PDB ID: 4RM9) at a DOPC:DOPS:PIP 2 (80:16:4ratio) membrane that was used in the molecular dynamics simulations in this study. d) Number of PIP 2 head groups phosphorus atoms within 10 Å of any atoms in the residues in FERM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (α = 0.05) between the means of contact counts between 0-10 ns and 495-505 ns or 990-1000 ns, e) Aggregation of PIP 2 (orange), DOPS (blue) and DOPC (gray) phospholipids in a PIP 2 /DOPS/DOPC membrane at the F1-F3 surface of ezrin FERM domain at t = 1000 ns mark. f) Number of DOPS within 10 Å of the residues in FERM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (independent sample t-test, α=0.05) between the means of contact counts between 0-10 ns and 495-505 ns or 990-1000 ns. Double asterisk (**) indicates significant difference (ANOVA, α = 0.05) between the means in systems with DOPC/DOPS/PIP 2 membranes and DOPC/DOPS membranes in the 990-1000 ns interval. g) Aggregation of DOPS phospholipids (blue) in a DOPS/DOPC membrane at the F1-F3 surface of ezrin FERM domain at t = 1000 ns mark.
    Ezrin Mouse Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ezrin mouse monoclonal antibody/product/Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ezrin mouse monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems rabbit monoclonal anti ezrin
    a) <t>Ezrin</t> protein sequence: membrane binding FERM domain consists of three lobes – F1 (residues P2-P86), F2 (residues E87-G202), and F3 (residues I203-K296); linker region consists of residues P297-P496; and the actin-binding C-terminal domain (CTD) consists of residues T497-L586. b) AlphaFold 3.0 predicted closed-form structure of the full-length ezrin protein . In the predicted closed-form ezrin structure, C-terminal CTD domain interacts with FERM over the F2-F3 subdomain surface. c) System setup for the FERM-CTD structure (PDB ID: 4RM9) at a DOPC:DOPS:PIP 2 (80:16:4ratio) membrane that was used in the molecular dynamics simulations in this study. d) Number of PIP 2 head groups phosphorus atoms within 10 Å of any atoms in the residues in FERM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (α = 0.05) between the means of contact counts between 0-10 ns and 495-505 ns or 990-1000 ns, e) Aggregation of PIP 2 (orange), DOPS (blue) and DOPC (gray) phospholipids in a PIP 2 /DOPS/DOPC membrane at the F1-F3 surface of ezrin FERM domain at t = 1000 ns mark. f) Number of DOPS within 10 Å of the residues in FERM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (independent sample t-test, α=0.05) between the means of contact counts between 0-10 ns and 495-505 ns or 990-1000 ns. Double asterisk (**) indicates significant difference (ANOVA, α = 0.05) between the means in systems with DOPC/DOPS/PIP 2 membranes and DOPC/DOPS membranes in the 990-1000 ns interval. g) Aggregation of DOPS phospholipids (blue) in a DOPS/DOPC membrane at the F1-F3 surface of ezrin FERM domain at t = 1000 ns mark.
    Rabbit Monoclonal Anti Ezrin, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit monoclonal anti ezrin/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit monoclonal anti ezrin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Danaher Inc mouse monoclonal anti ezrin
    a) <t>Ezrin</t> protein sequence: membrane binding FERM domain consists of three lobes – F1 (residues P2-P86), F2 (residues E87-G202), and F3 (residues I203-K296); linker region consists of residues P297-P496; and the actin-binding C-terminal domain (CTD) consists of residues T497-L586. b) AlphaFold 3.0 predicted closed-form structure of the full-length ezrin protein . In the predicted closed-form ezrin structure, C-terminal CTD domain interacts with FERM over the F2-F3 subdomain surface. c) System setup for the FERM-CTD structure (PDB ID: 4RM9) at a DOPC:DOPS:PIP 2 (80:16:4ratio) membrane that was used in the molecular dynamics simulations in this study. d) Number of PIP 2 head groups phosphorus atoms within 10 Å of any atoms in the residues in FERM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (α = 0.05) between the means of contact counts between 0-10 ns and 495-505 ns or 990-1000 ns, e) Aggregation of PIP 2 (orange), DOPS (blue) and DOPC (gray) phospholipids in a PIP 2 /DOPS/DOPC membrane at the F1-F3 surface of ezrin FERM domain at t = 1000 ns mark. f) Number of DOPS within 10 Å of the residues in FERM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (independent sample t-test, α=0.05) between the means of contact counts between 0-10 ns and 495-505 ns or 990-1000 ns. Double asterisk (**) indicates significant difference (ANOVA, α = 0.05) between the means in systems with DOPC/DOPS/PIP 2 membranes and DOPC/DOPS membranes in the 990-1000 ns interval. g) Aggregation of DOPS phospholipids (blue) in a DOPS/DOPC membrane at the F1-F3 surface of ezrin FERM domain at t = 1000 ns mark.
    Mouse Monoclonal Anti Ezrin, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti ezrin/product/Danaher Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal anti ezrin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse monoclonal anti human ezrin antibody
    Figure 5. Gene and protein biomarkers expression depending on tumor metastatic ability. a) Relative gene expression of VEGFA, COL1A1, MMP2, and MMP9 in the (i) low-metastatic and (ii) high-metastatic models for the different culture conditions, normalized to the static culture. b) Comparison of low- and high-metastatic relative gene expression of (i) VEGFA, (ii) COL1A1, and (iii) MMP2, for each culture condition. c) ELISA quantification of VEGFA protein secretion at days 3, 4, and 7. Statistical significance between different culture conditions, for the same time-point, is represented with a solid line. Unless otherwise stated, time-dependent significance in each culture condition and model is statistically different. d) Confocal images of <t>Ezrin</t> expression (green) in the low-metastatic model, at 7 days of culture. Actin filaments and nuclei are stained in red and blue, respectively. Scale bar: 200 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n ≥3). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001, ns: not significant.
    Mouse Monoclonal Anti Human Ezrin Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti human ezrin antibody/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal anti human ezrin antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Diagnostic BioSystems monoclonal (clone 3c12) mouse anti-ezrin antibodies
    Figure 5. Gene and protein biomarkers expression depending on tumor metastatic ability. a) Relative gene expression of VEGFA, COL1A1, MMP2, and MMP9 in the (i) low-metastatic and (ii) high-metastatic models for the different culture conditions, normalized to the static culture. b) Comparison of low- and high-metastatic relative gene expression of (i) VEGFA, (ii) COL1A1, and (iii) MMP2, for each culture condition. c) ELISA quantification of VEGFA protein secretion at days 3, 4, and 7. Statistical significance between different culture conditions, for the same time-point, is represented with a solid line. Unless otherwise stated, time-dependent significance in each culture condition and model is statistically different. d) Confocal images of <t>Ezrin</t> expression (green) in the low-metastatic model, at 7 days of culture. Actin filaments and nuclei are stained in red and blue, respectively. Scale bar: 200 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n ≥3). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001, ns: not significant.
    Monoclonal (Clone 3c12) Mouse Anti Ezrin Antibodies, supplied by Diagnostic BioSystems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/monoclonal (clone 3c12) mouse anti-ezrin antibodies/product/Diagnostic BioSystems
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    monoclonal (clone 3c12) mouse anti-ezrin antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Diagnostic BioSystems monoclonal (clone 3c12) mouse anti-ezrin antibodies mob380
    a Representative examples of immunostaining for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in cortical tissue from younger (left) and older (right) adults. b Percentage of the image covered by pixels stained for GFAP in two age groups ( P < 0.001; younger adults: N = 3 people, n = 24 images; older adults; N = 4 people, n = 34 images). c Representative examples of immunostaining for <t>ezrin</t> in cortical tissue from younger (left) and older (right) adults. The astrocytic territorial domains are outlined by dotted line. d Ezrin immunostaining intensity averaged in the astrocyte territorial domain and normalized to the immunostaining intensity of soma in two age groups ( P < 0.001; younger adults: N = 3 people, n = 9 cells; older adults: N = 4 people, n = 12 cells). e Representative Western blots of cortex homogenates stained by antibodies against GFAP (left) and total protein bands (right). f GFAP amount normalized to total protein amount in two age groups ( P = 0.04; younger adults: N = 7 people; older adults: N = 7 people; n = N ). g , h Same as ( e , f ) but for ezrin ( P = 0.005; N/n —numbers are the same as for ( f )). i , j Same as ( e , f ) but for glutamine synthetase, GS ( P = 0.03; N/n —numbers are the same as for ( f )). Data are shown as box-and-whisker plots where the box is Q1 and Q3 with median, and whiskers are the ranges within 1.5IQR. Empty boxes/circles—younger adults, filled boxes/circles—older adults. Two-tailed (except for ( f ), where one-tailed) Mann–Whitney test: N.S. P > 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Monoclonal (Clone 3c12) Mouse Anti Ezrin Antibodies Mob380, supplied by Diagnostic BioSystems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/monoclonal (clone 3c12) mouse anti-ezrin antibodies mob380/product/Diagnostic BioSystems
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    monoclonal (clone 3c12) mouse anti-ezrin antibodies mob380 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse monoclonal antibodies
    a Representative examples of immunostaining for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in cortical tissue from younger (left) and older (right) adults. b Percentage of the image covered by pixels stained for GFAP in two age groups ( P < 0.001; younger adults: N = 3 people, n = 24 images; older adults; N = 4 people, n = 34 images). c Representative examples of immunostaining for <t>ezrin</t> in cortical tissue from younger (left) and older (right) adults. The astrocytic territorial domains are outlined by dotted line. d Ezrin immunostaining intensity averaged in the astrocyte territorial domain and normalized to the immunostaining intensity of soma in two age groups ( P < 0.001; younger adults: N = 3 people, n = 9 cells; older adults: N = 4 people, n = 12 cells). e Representative Western blots of cortex homogenates stained by antibodies against GFAP (left) and total protein bands (right). f GFAP amount normalized to total protein amount in two age groups ( P = 0.04; younger adults: N = 7 people; older adults: N = 7 people; n = N ). g , h Same as ( e , f ) but for ezrin ( P = 0.005; N/n —numbers are the same as for ( f )). i , j Same as ( e , f ) but for glutamine synthetase, GS ( P = 0.03; N/n —numbers are the same as for ( f )). Data are shown as box-and-whisker plots where the box is Q1 and Q3 with median, and whiskers are the ranges within 1.5IQR. Empty boxes/circles—younger adults, filled boxes/circles—older adults. Two-tailed (except for ( f ), where one-tailed) Mann–Whitney test: N.S. P > 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal antibodies/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Thermo Fisher mouse monoclonal anti-ezrin antibody
    Primers for quantitative reverse transcription-2 polymerase chain reaction and siRNA sequences
    Mouse Monoclonal Anti Ezrin Antibody, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti-ezrin antibody/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal anti-ezrin antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    98
    Abcam mouse monoclonal anti ezrin
    Membrane expression of WT and <t>p.V240M</t> <t>HCN4</t> channels. Representative WB images ( A ) and densitometric analyses ( B ) of biotinylation assays showing the total (input) or surface (membrane) expression of HCN4 in cells expressing WT or p.V240M channels. The cytosolic protein <t>ezrin</t> was used as a negative control. In B , each dot represents 1 experiment and each bar the mean±SEM of n experiments (biological replicates). Unpaired Student t-test. Figure 6 -source data 1 of panel A. Figure 6 -source data 2 of panel B.
    Mouse Monoclonal Anti Ezrin, supplied by Abcam, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti ezrin/product/Abcam
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal anti ezrin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a) Ezrin protein sequence: membrane binding FERM domain consists of three lobes – F1 (residues P2-P86), F2 (residues E87-G202), and F3 (residues I203-K296); linker region consists of residues P297-P496; and the actin-binding C-terminal domain (CTD) consists of residues T497-L586. b) AlphaFold 3.0 predicted closed-form structure of the full-length ezrin protein . In the predicted closed-form ezrin structure, C-terminal CTD domain interacts with FERM over the F2-F3 subdomain surface. c) System setup for the FERM-CTD structure (PDB ID: 4RM9) at a DOPC:DOPS:PIP 2 (80:16:4ratio) membrane that was used in the molecular dynamics simulations in this study. d) Number of PIP 2 head groups phosphorus atoms within 10 Å of any atoms in the residues in FERM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (α = 0.05) between the means of contact counts between 0-10 ns and 495-505 ns or 990-1000 ns, e) Aggregation of PIP 2 (orange), DOPS (blue) and DOPC (gray) phospholipids in a PIP 2 /DOPS/DOPC membrane at the F1-F3 surface of ezrin FERM domain at t = 1000 ns mark. f) Number of DOPS within 10 Å of the residues in FERM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (independent sample t-test, α=0.05) between the means of contact counts between 0-10 ns and 495-505 ns or 990-1000 ns. Double asterisk (**) indicates significant difference (ANOVA, α = 0.05) between the means in systems with DOPC/DOPS/PIP 2 membranes and DOPC/DOPS membranes in the 990-1000 ns interval. g) Aggregation of DOPS phospholipids (blue) in a DOPS/DOPC membrane at the F1-F3 surface of ezrin FERM domain at t = 1000 ns mark.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: On the Mechanism of Ezrin Activation

    doi: 10.1101/2025.11.07.687285

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a) Ezrin protein sequence: membrane binding FERM domain consists of three lobes – F1 (residues P2-P86), F2 (residues E87-G202), and F3 (residues I203-K296); linker region consists of residues P297-P496; and the actin-binding C-terminal domain (CTD) consists of residues T497-L586. b) AlphaFold 3.0 predicted closed-form structure of the full-length ezrin protein . In the predicted closed-form ezrin structure, C-terminal CTD domain interacts with FERM over the F2-F3 subdomain surface. c) System setup for the FERM-CTD structure (PDB ID: 4RM9) at a DOPC:DOPS:PIP 2 (80:16:4ratio) membrane that was used in the molecular dynamics simulations in this study. d) Number of PIP 2 head groups phosphorus atoms within 10 Å of any atoms in the residues in FERM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (α = 0.05) between the means of contact counts between 0-10 ns and 495-505 ns or 990-1000 ns, e) Aggregation of PIP 2 (orange), DOPS (blue) and DOPC (gray) phospholipids in a PIP 2 /DOPS/DOPC membrane at the F1-F3 surface of ezrin FERM domain at t = 1000 ns mark. f) Number of DOPS within 10 Å of the residues in FERM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (independent sample t-test, α=0.05) between the means of contact counts between 0-10 ns and 495-505 ns or 990-1000 ns. Double asterisk (**) indicates significant difference (ANOVA, α = 0.05) between the means in systems with DOPC/DOPS/PIP 2 membranes and DOPC/DOPS membranes in the 990-1000 ns interval. g) Aggregation of DOPS phospholipids (blue) in a DOPS/DOPC membrane at the F1-F3 surface of ezrin FERM domain at t = 1000 ns mark.

    Article Snippet: Ezrin mouse monoclonal antibody (DSHB cat# CPTC-Ezrin-1) was used at a dilution of 1:5000 and Phospho-ezrin was detected using rabbit anti-pT567 antibody, raised against recombinant phosphopeptide CRDKYK(pT)LRQIR ( ) was used at a dilution of 1:1000.

    Techniques: Sequencing, Membrane, Binding Assay

    a) Hydrogen bond counts between ezrin F2-CTD lobes (left) and ezrin F3-CTD lobes (right). Significantly more hydrogen bonds are broken in the system where ezrin has a phosphorylated T567 residue. b) Significant opening between CTD residues AA538-AA546 and FERM F2 lobe is only observed in the FERM-CTD system with phosphorylated T567 at a PIP 2 /DOPS/DOPC membrane. Left – crystal structure of ezrin FERM and C-ERMAD (PDB ID:4RM9). Right – distance between alpha carbon atoms of residue pairs K162-R542, Q160-K546, R156-T548 in the beginning of the equilibrated unbiased MD simulations (t=0 ns) and the end of the 1 µs simulation (t=1000 ns) for versions of the system that contain either a nonphosphorylated T567 (npT567, top) or phosphorylated T567 (pT567, bottom). b)-d) Distances of CTD residue Cα atoms from the Cα atoms of their nearest FERM F2-F3 residues. b) distances of CTD residues AA538-AA542 increase only for a system phosphorylated T567 at a PIP 2 /DOPS/DOPC membrane (red), c) large changes in distances are observed between Cα atoms of CTD helix H3 (residues AA549-AA559) and FERM F3 residues K230-T235 an CTD helix H3, d) no significant change in distance is observed between CTD helix H5 (residues T576-L586) and nearest FERM atoms. e) Coulombic potentials between CTD helices H1-H5 and nearest secondary structures in FERM F2-F3 lobes. Helices H1-H5 correspond to amino acid residues as follows: H1 – residues E525-Q540, H2 – residues A541-R547, H3 – residues H549-R559, H4 – residues K564-R572, H5 – residues T576-L586. Notation: pT567 – system with a phosphorylated T567, wt – system with a nonphosphorylated T567, soln – simulation carried out in a KCl solution. Asterisks (*) indicate a statistically significant coulombic attraction strength difference for a certain CTD helix between the FERM-CTD pT567 system at a PIP 2 /DOPC/DOPS membrane against any other systems. The inset provides a visualization of H1-H5 CTD helices in the crystal structure of closed state ezrin (PDB ID: 4RM9).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: On the Mechanism of Ezrin Activation

    doi: 10.1101/2025.11.07.687285

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a) Hydrogen bond counts between ezrin F2-CTD lobes (left) and ezrin F3-CTD lobes (right). Significantly more hydrogen bonds are broken in the system where ezrin has a phosphorylated T567 residue. b) Significant opening between CTD residues AA538-AA546 and FERM F2 lobe is only observed in the FERM-CTD system with phosphorylated T567 at a PIP 2 /DOPS/DOPC membrane. Left – crystal structure of ezrin FERM and C-ERMAD (PDB ID:4RM9). Right – distance between alpha carbon atoms of residue pairs K162-R542, Q160-K546, R156-T548 in the beginning of the equilibrated unbiased MD simulations (t=0 ns) and the end of the 1 µs simulation (t=1000 ns) for versions of the system that contain either a nonphosphorylated T567 (npT567, top) or phosphorylated T567 (pT567, bottom). b)-d) Distances of CTD residue Cα atoms from the Cα atoms of their nearest FERM F2-F3 residues. b) distances of CTD residues AA538-AA542 increase only for a system phosphorylated T567 at a PIP 2 /DOPS/DOPC membrane (red), c) large changes in distances are observed between Cα atoms of CTD helix H3 (residues AA549-AA559) and FERM F3 residues K230-T235 an CTD helix H3, d) no significant change in distance is observed between CTD helix H5 (residues T576-L586) and nearest FERM atoms. e) Coulombic potentials between CTD helices H1-H5 and nearest secondary structures in FERM F2-F3 lobes. Helices H1-H5 correspond to amino acid residues as follows: H1 – residues E525-Q540, H2 – residues A541-R547, H3 – residues H549-R559, H4 – residues K564-R572, H5 – residues T576-L586. Notation: pT567 – system with a phosphorylated T567, wt – system with a nonphosphorylated T567, soln – simulation carried out in a KCl solution. Asterisks (*) indicate a statistically significant coulombic attraction strength difference for a certain CTD helix between the FERM-CTD pT567 system at a PIP 2 /DOPC/DOPS membrane against any other systems. The inset provides a visualization of H1-H5 CTD helices in the crystal structure of closed state ezrin (PDB ID: 4RM9).

    Article Snippet: Ezrin mouse monoclonal antibody (DSHB cat# CPTC-Ezrin-1) was used at a dilution of 1:5000 and Phospho-ezrin was detected using rabbit anti-pT567 antibody, raised against recombinant phosphopeptide CRDKYK(pT)LRQIR ( ) was used at a dilution of 1:1000.

    Techniques: Residue, Membrane

    a) Well-tempered metadynamics contact map collective variable can be successfully used to make the ezrin system undergo a full dissociation between FERM and CTD domains in about 20 ns. Image on the right is the schematic of how the contact map CV includes contacts across the entire surface of CTD and FERM F2-F3 lobes. b) The free energy surfaces of well-tempered contact map WTMetaD show that ezrin system with nonphosphorylated T567 has a mean barrier of 11.2 ± 0.3 kcal/mol for the transition from closed to dissociated FERM-CTD (blue) and a 3.2 ± 0.5 kcal/mol transition barrier between the closed and open states when the system has a phosphorylated T567 residue. The barrier of EBP50-FERM dissociation (11.7 ± 1.1 kcal/mol) is similar to that of FERM-wtCTD. Results are reported as mean (± SE) of sample free energy values corresponding to certain contact map collective variable values. The free energy profiles converged in 50-100 ns of the WTMetaD runs (Supplementary Figure S8). c) Ezrin FERM-CTD crystal structure (PDB ID: 4RM9). d) Crystal structure of ezrin FERM domain and EBP50 C-terminal residues (PDB ID: 1SGH). The C-terminal end of ezrin CTD domain has very similar alignment to F3 lobe of FERM as does the end helix of EBP50. e)-f) Distance between the C α atoms of different contact map pairs at contact map values 0.1-0.9 obtained from WTMetaD runs between F3 and CTD (e), and between F2 and CTD (f). Results in e)-f) are presented as mean distance and standard error for each of the contact map coordinate values collected from all WTMetaD simulation frames that have a contact map value in a certain range. g) RMSF plots for lobe F2 (left) and F3 (right) during the WTMetaD simulations for the system with phosphorylated T567 (red) and the system with nonphosphorylated T567 (blue).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: On the Mechanism of Ezrin Activation

    doi: 10.1101/2025.11.07.687285

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a) Well-tempered metadynamics contact map collective variable can be successfully used to make the ezrin system undergo a full dissociation between FERM and CTD domains in about 20 ns. Image on the right is the schematic of how the contact map CV includes contacts across the entire surface of CTD and FERM F2-F3 lobes. b) The free energy surfaces of well-tempered contact map WTMetaD show that ezrin system with nonphosphorylated T567 has a mean barrier of 11.2 ± 0.3 kcal/mol for the transition from closed to dissociated FERM-CTD (blue) and a 3.2 ± 0.5 kcal/mol transition barrier between the closed and open states when the system has a phosphorylated T567 residue. The barrier of EBP50-FERM dissociation (11.7 ± 1.1 kcal/mol) is similar to that of FERM-wtCTD. Results are reported as mean (± SE) of sample free energy values corresponding to certain contact map collective variable values. The free energy profiles converged in 50-100 ns of the WTMetaD runs (Supplementary Figure S8). c) Ezrin FERM-CTD crystal structure (PDB ID: 4RM9). d) Crystal structure of ezrin FERM domain and EBP50 C-terminal residues (PDB ID: 1SGH). The C-terminal end of ezrin CTD domain has very similar alignment to F3 lobe of FERM as does the end helix of EBP50. e)-f) Distance between the C α atoms of different contact map pairs at contact map values 0.1-0.9 obtained from WTMetaD runs between F3 and CTD (e), and between F2 and CTD (f). Results in e)-f) are presented as mean distance and standard error for each of the contact map coordinate values collected from all WTMetaD simulation frames that have a contact map value in a certain range. g) RMSF plots for lobe F2 (left) and F3 (right) during the WTMetaD simulations for the system with phosphorylated T567 (red) and the system with nonphosphorylated T567 (blue).

    Article Snippet: Ezrin mouse monoclonal antibody (DSHB cat# CPTC-Ezrin-1) was used at a dilution of 1:5000 and Phospho-ezrin was detected using rabbit anti-pT567 antibody, raised against recombinant phosphopeptide CRDKYK(pT)LRQIR ( ) was used at a dilution of 1:1000.

    Techniques: Residue

    a) Coomassie staining of purified proteins isolated from either HEK-293T cells (LOK-GFP-Flag) or Bacterial expression (EBP50 constructs and Ezrin). b) Western blotting of biochemical in vitro kinase assays blotting for total Ezrin vs. Ezrin phosphorylated at T567 (pT567). Purified full length untagged Ezrin and LOK-GFP-Flag kinase and were added at a constant concentration 1.5mg/ml and 0.05mg/ml respectively. Prior to the addition of ATP, the proteins were incubated with 0.5mg/ml of EBP50 or EBP50 variants and PI(4,5)P 2 was either added or withheld from duplicates of each EBP50 condition. Mutations in the two PDZ domains activate EBP50 leading to constitutively active binding between EBP50 and Ezrin’s FERM domain while EBP50’s tail domain is an unregulated Ezrin FERM binding motif. Phosphorylation of Ezrin at pT567 was PI(4,5)P 2 dependent but independent from EBP50 binding. c) Western blotting of lysate from human WT Jeg-3 epithelial cells and Jeg-3 CRISPR knockouts of EBP50 and LOK/SLK. Cells were treated with either the phosphatase inhibitor Calyculin A (Cal. A), the kinase inhibitor Staurosporine (Staursp) or no treatment prior to lysing and blotted for total Ezrin vs. Ezrin phosphorylated at T567 (pT567). Cells lacking EBP50 have less pT567 than their WT counterparts. The effect of treatment with Cal. A or Staursp. is not altered in cells lacking EBP50 vs. WT cells indicating that EBP50 influences the turnover but not the capacity of phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of ezrin at T567. Cells lacking the endogenous ERM kinases LOK/SLK have no phosphorylation at T567.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: On the Mechanism of Ezrin Activation

    doi: 10.1101/2025.11.07.687285

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a) Coomassie staining of purified proteins isolated from either HEK-293T cells (LOK-GFP-Flag) or Bacterial expression (EBP50 constructs and Ezrin). b) Western blotting of biochemical in vitro kinase assays blotting for total Ezrin vs. Ezrin phosphorylated at T567 (pT567). Purified full length untagged Ezrin and LOK-GFP-Flag kinase and were added at a constant concentration 1.5mg/ml and 0.05mg/ml respectively. Prior to the addition of ATP, the proteins were incubated with 0.5mg/ml of EBP50 or EBP50 variants and PI(4,5)P 2 was either added or withheld from duplicates of each EBP50 condition. Mutations in the two PDZ domains activate EBP50 leading to constitutively active binding between EBP50 and Ezrin’s FERM domain while EBP50’s tail domain is an unregulated Ezrin FERM binding motif. Phosphorylation of Ezrin at pT567 was PI(4,5)P 2 dependent but independent from EBP50 binding. c) Western blotting of lysate from human WT Jeg-3 epithelial cells and Jeg-3 CRISPR knockouts of EBP50 and LOK/SLK. Cells were treated with either the phosphatase inhibitor Calyculin A (Cal. A), the kinase inhibitor Staurosporine (Staursp) or no treatment prior to lysing and blotted for total Ezrin vs. Ezrin phosphorylated at T567 (pT567). Cells lacking EBP50 have less pT567 than their WT counterparts. The effect of treatment with Cal. A or Staursp. is not altered in cells lacking EBP50 vs. WT cells indicating that EBP50 influences the turnover but not the capacity of phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of ezrin at T567. Cells lacking the endogenous ERM kinases LOK/SLK have no phosphorylation at T567.

    Article Snippet: Ezrin mouse monoclonal antibody (DSHB cat# CPTC-Ezrin-1) was used at a dilution of 1:5000 and Phospho-ezrin was detected using rabbit anti-pT567 antibody, raised against recombinant phosphopeptide CRDKYK(pT)LRQIR ( ) was used at a dilution of 1:1000.

    Techniques: Staining, Purification, Isolation, Expressing, Construct, Western Blot, In Vitro, Concentration Assay, Incubation, Binding Assay, Phospho-proteomics, CRISPR, De-Phosphorylation Assay

    a)-b) Closed state ezrin is attracted to apical cell membranes due to highly negatively charged PIP 2 phospholipids. c) Upon attachment to membrane, FERM F1 and F3 subdomains recruit more PIP 2 . d) Ezrin wtCTD spontaneously dissociates from FERM over long timescales. e) Dissociation of CTD leaves space between FERM and CTD for LOK kinase to phosphorylate the T567 residue. f) Upon T567 phosphorylation, ezrin primarily remains in the open state due to the lower propensity to inhabit the closed state. g) CTD is enabled to float away and interact with actin filaments, thus leaving space for downstream FERM F2-F3 interactions with EBP50 or other cellular targets.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: On the Mechanism of Ezrin Activation

    doi: 10.1101/2025.11.07.687285

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a)-b) Closed state ezrin is attracted to apical cell membranes due to highly negatively charged PIP 2 phospholipids. c) Upon attachment to membrane, FERM F1 and F3 subdomains recruit more PIP 2 . d) Ezrin wtCTD spontaneously dissociates from FERM over long timescales. e) Dissociation of CTD leaves space between FERM and CTD for LOK kinase to phosphorylate the T567 residue. f) Upon T567 phosphorylation, ezrin primarily remains in the open state due to the lower propensity to inhabit the closed state. g) CTD is enabled to float away and interact with actin filaments, thus leaving space for downstream FERM F2-F3 interactions with EBP50 or other cellular targets.

    Article Snippet: Ezrin mouse monoclonal antibody (DSHB cat# CPTC-Ezrin-1) was used at a dilution of 1:5000 and Phospho-ezrin was detected using rabbit anti-pT567 antibody, raised against recombinant phosphopeptide CRDKYK(pT)LRQIR ( ) was used at a dilution of 1:1000.

    Techniques: Membrane, Residue, Phospho-proteomics

    Figure 5. Gene and protein biomarkers expression depending on tumor metastatic ability. a) Relative gene expression of VEGFA, COL1A1, MMP2, and MMP9 in the (i) low-metastatic and (ii) high-metastatic models for the different culture conditions, normalized to the static culture. b) Comparison of low- and high-metastatic relative gene expression of (i) VEGFA, (ii) COL1A1, and (iii) MMP2, for each culture condition. c) ELISA quantification of VEGFA protein secretion at days 3, 4, and 7. Statistical significance between different culture conditions, for the same time-point, is represented with a solid line. Unless otherwise stated, time-dependent significance in each culture condition and model is statistically different. d) Confocal images of Ezrin expression (green) in the low-metastatic model, at 7 days of culture. Actin filaments and nuclei are stained in red and blue, respectively. Scale bar: 200 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n ≥3). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001, ns: not significant.

    Journal: Advanced Functional Materials

    Article Title: Tumor‐On‐A‐Chip Model Incorporating Human‐Based Hydrogels for Easy Assessment of Metastatic Tumor Inter‐Heterogeneity

    doi: 10.1002/adfm.202315940

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5. Gene and protein biomarkers expression depending on tumor metastatic ability. a) Relative gene expression of VEGFA, COL1A1, MMP2, and MMP9 in the (i) low-metastatic and (ii) high-metastatic models for the different culture conditions, normalized to the static culture. b) Comparison of low- and high-metastatic relative gene expression of (i) VEGFA, (ii) COL1A1, and (iii) MMP2, for each culture condition. c) ELISA quantification of VEGFA protein secretion at days 3, 4, and 7. Statistical significance between different culture conditions, for the same time-point, is represented with a solid line. Unless otherwise stated, time-dependent significance in each culture condition and model is statistically different. d) Confocal images of Ezrin expression (green) in the low-metastatic model, at 7 days of culture. Actin filaments and nuclei are stained in red and blue, respectively. Scale bar: 200 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n ≥3). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001, ns: not significant.

    Article Snippet: The samples were incubated with primary mouse monoclonal anti-human Ezrin antibody (1:50 in 5% FBS (v/v) in PBS, 3C12, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) at 4 °C for 3 days, followed by PBS washing for 1 h, and then incubated with the secondary antibody goat antimouse Alexa Fluor 488 (1:100 in 5% FBS (v/v) in PBS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) at 4 °C for 3 days.

    Techniques: Expressing, Gene Expression, Comparison, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Staining

    a Representative examples of immunostaining for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in cortical tissue from younger (left) and older (right) adults. b Percentage of the image covered by pixels stained for GFAP in two age groups ( P < 0.001; younger adults: N = 3 people, n = 24 images; older adults; N = 4 people, n = 34 images). c Representative examples of immunostaining for ezrin in cortical tissue from younger (left) and older (right) adults. The astrocytic territorial domains are outlined by dotted line. d Ezrin immunostaining intensity averaged in the astrocyte territorial domain and normalized to the immunostaining intensity of soma in two age groups ( P < 0.001; younger adults: N = 3 people, n = 9 cells; older adults: N = 4 people, n = 12 cells). e Representative Western blots of cortex homogenates stained by antibodies against GFAP (left) and total protein bands (right). f GFAP amount normalized to total protein amount in two age groups ( P = 0.04; younger adults: N = 7 people; older adults: N = 7 people; n = N ). g , h Same as ( e , f ) but for ezrin ( P = 0.005; N/n —numbers are the same as for ( f )). i , j Same as ( e , f ) but for glutamine synthetase, GS ( P = 0.03; N/n —numbers are the same as for ( f )). Data are shown as box-and-whisker plots where the box is Q1 and Q3 with median, and whiskers are the ranges within 1.5IQR. Empty boxes/circles—younger adults, filled boxes/circles—older adults. Two-tailed (except for ( f ), where one-tailed) Mann–Whitney test: N.S. P > 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Mitochondrial malfunction and atrophy of astrocytes in the aged human cerebral cortex

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44192-0

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Representative examples of immunostaining for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in cortical tissue from younger (left) and older (right) adults. b Percentage of the image covered by pixels stained for GFAP in two age groups ( P < 0.001; younger adults: N = 3 people, n = 24 images; older adults; N = 4 people, n = 34 images). c Representative examples of immunostaining for ezrin in cortical tissue from younger (left) and older (right) adults. The astrocytic territorial domains are outlined by dotted line. d Ezrin immunostaining intensity averaged in the astrocyte territorial domain and normalized to the immunostaining intensity of soma in two age groups ( P < 0.001; younger adults: N = 3 people, n = 9 cells; older adults: N = 4 people, n = 12 cells). e Representative Western blots of cortex homogenates stained by antibodies against GFAP (left) and total protein bands (right). f GFAP amount normalized to total protein amount in two age groups ( P = 0.04; younger adults: N = 7 people; older adults: N = 7 people; n = N ). g , h Same as ( e , f ) but for ezrin ( P = 0.005; N/n —numbers are the same as for ( f )). i , j Same as ( e , f ) but for glutamine synthetase, GS ( P = 0.03; N/n —numbers are the same as for ( f )). Data are shown as box-and-whisker plots where the box is Q1 and Q3 with median, and whiskers are the ranges within 1.5IQR. Empty boxes/circles—younger adults, filled boxes/circles—older adults. Two-tailed (except for ( f ), where one-tailed) Mann–Whitney test: N.S. P > 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Article Snippet: The sections were incubated for 48 h in monoclonal (clone 3C12) mouse anti-ezrin antibodies (1:100, Diagnostic BioSystems, Pleasanton, USA, catalog number Mob380) in monoclonal (clone GA5) mouse anti-GFAP antibodies (1:100, Biocare Medical, Pacheco, USA, catalog number CM065).

    Techniques: Immunostaining, Staining, Western Blot, Whisker Assay, Two Tailed Test, One-tailed Test, MANN-WHITNEY

    Primers for quantitative reverse transcription-2 polymerase chain reaction and siRNA sequences

    Journal: Neural Regeneration Research

    Article Title: The relationship among amyloid-β deposition, sphingomyelin level, and the expression and function of P-glycoprotein in Alzheimer’s disease pathological process

    doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.358607

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Primers for quantitative reverse transcription-2 polymerase chain reaction and siRNA sequences

    Article Snippet: The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat milk (Servicebio, Cat# GC310001-100g) in PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (Servicebio, Cat# GC204002) and then incubated with the following primary antibodies: rabbit monoclonal anti-P-glycoprotein antibody (1:300, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, Cat# ab170904, RRID: AB_2687930), mouse monoclonal anti-ezrin antibody (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 35-7300, RRID: AB_87580), rabbit monoclonal anti-radixin antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Cat# 2636, RRID: AB_2238294), rabbit monoclonal anti-moesin antibody (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# PA5-34666, RRID: AB_2552018), rabbit polyclonal anti-SMS1 antibody (1:1000, Bioss, Cat# bs-4216R, RRID: AB_11111297), rabbit polyclonal anti-SMS2 antibody (1:1000, Bioss, Cat# bs-5694R, RRID: AB_2920897), rabbit polyclonal anti-nSMase1 antibody (1:1000, Bioss, Cat# bs-19472R, RRID: AB_2920898), and rabbit monoclonal anti-GAPDH antibody (1:4000, Beyotime, Cat# AF1186, RRID: AB_2920889).

    Techniques: Polymerase Chain Reaction

    The expression of ERM in the brains of APP/PS1 mice compared with that in age-matched WT mice. (A–C) qRT-PCR analysis of ezrin (A), radixin (B), and moesin (C) mRNA expression in brains of indicated mice. n = 3. (D) Western blots (left panel) and quantitative results (right panel) of ezrin, radixin, and moesin protein expression. n = 3. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001. The experiments were repeated at least three times. ERM: Ezrin, radixin, and moesin; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; qRT-PCR: quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; WT: wild-type.

    Journal: Neural Regeneration Research

    Article Title: The relationship among amyloid-β deposition, sphingomyelin level, and the expression and function of P-glycoprotein in Alzheimer’s disease pathological process

    doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.358607

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The expression of ERM in the brains of APP/PS1 mice compared with that in age-matched WT mice. (A–C) qRT-PCR analysis of ezrin (A), radixin (B), and moesin (C) mRNA expression in brains of indicated mice. n = 3. (D) Western blots (left panel) and quantitative results (right panel) of ezrin, radixin, and moesin protein expression. n = 3. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001. The experiments were repeated at least three times. ERM: Ezrin, radixin, and moesin; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; qRT-PCR: quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; WT: wild-type.

    Article Snippet: The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat milk (Servicebio, Cat# GC310001-100g) in PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (Servicebio, Cat# GC204002) and then incubated with the following primary antibodies: rabbit monoclonal anti-P-glycoprotein antibody (1:300, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, Cat# ab170904, RRID: AB_2687930), mouse monoclonal anti-ezrin antibody (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 35-7300, RRID: AB_87580), rabbit monoclonal anti-radixin antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Cat# 2636, RRID: AB_2238294), rabbit monoclonal anti-moesin antibody (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# PA5-34666, RRID: AB_2552018), rabbit polyclonal anti-SMS1 antibody (1:1000, Bioss, Cat# bs-4216R, RRID: AB_11111297), rabbit polyclonal anti-SMS2 antibody (1:1000, Bioss, Cat# bs-5694R, RRID: AB_2920897), rabbit polyclonal anti-nSMase1 antibody (1:1000, Bioss, Cat# bs-19472R, RRID: AB_2920898), and rabbit monoclonal anti-GAPDH antibody (1:4000, Beyotime, Cat# AF1186, RRID: AB_2920889).

    Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction

    The expression and functionality of P-gp and SM metabolism in the Alzheimer’s disease mouse model induced by i.c.v. injection of Aβ 1–42 . (A) Western blot analysis of the expressions of P-gp, ezrin, and nSMase1 in the brain of indicated mice, n = 3. (B) Quantitative analysis of P-gp, ezrin, and nSMase1 protein expression, n = 3. (C–E) HPLC analysis of the concentrations of rh123 in brain tissue and plasma. n = 3. (F–H) SM level, ceramide level, and nSMase1 activity in the brain. n = 3. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05. The experiments were repeated at least three times. Aβ: Amyloid-β; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; HPLC: high performance liquid chromatography; nSMase1: neutral sphingomyelinase 1; P-gp: P-glycoprotein; SM: sphingomyelin; WT: wild-type.

    Journal: Neural Regeneration Research

    Article Title: The relationship among amyloid-β deposition, sphingomyelin level, and the expression and function of P-glycoprotein in Alzheimer’s disease pathological process

    doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.358607

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The expression and functionality of P-gp and SM metabolism in the Alzheimer’s disease mouse model induced by i.c.v. injection of Aβ 1–42 . (A) Western blot analysis of the expressions of P-gp, ezrin, and nSMase1 in the brain of indicated mice, n = 3. (B) Quantitative analysis of P-gp, ezrin, and nSMase1 protein expression, n = 3. (C–E) HPLC analysis of the concentrations of rh123 in brain tissue and plasma. n = 3. (F–H) SM level, ceramide level, and nSMase1 activity in the brain. n = 3. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05. The experiments were repeated at least three times. Aβ: Amyloid-β; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; HPLC: high performance liquid chromatography; nSMase1: neutral sphingomyelinase 1; P-gp: P-glycoprotein; SM: sphingomyelin; WT: wild-type.

    Article Snippet: The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat milk (Servicebio, Cat# GC310001-100g) in PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (Servicebio, Cat# GC204002) and then incubated with the following primary antibodies: rabbit monoclonal anti-P-glycoprotein antibody (1:300, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, Cat# ab170904, RRID: AB_2687930), mouse monoclonal anti-ezrin antibody (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 35-7300, RRID: AB_87580), rabbit monoclonal anti-radixin antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Cat# 2636, RRID: AB_2238294), rabbit monoclonal anti-moesin antibody (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# PA5-34666, RRID: AB_2552018), rabbit polyclonal anti-SMS1 antibody (1:1000, Bioss, Cat# bs-4216R, RRID: AB_11111297), rabbit polyclonal anti-SMS2 antibody (1:1000, Bioss, Cat# bs-5694R, RRID: AB_2920897), rabbit polyclonal anti-nSMase1 antibody (1:1000, Bioss, Cat# bs-19472R, RRID: AB_2920898), and rabbit monoclonal anti-GAPDH antibody (1:4000, Beyotime, Cat# AF1186, RRID: AB_2920889).

    Techniques: Expressing, Injection, Western Blot, Activity Assay, High Performance Liquid Chromatography

    The effect of Aβ 1–42 treatment on SM and P-gp in hCMEC/D3 cells. (A) MTT analysis of hCMEC/D3 cell viability. (B) Western blot analysis of the expressions of P-gp, ezrin, nSMase1, SMS1 and SMS2. (C) HPLC analysis of the intracellular accumulation of rh123 in hCMEC/D3 cells. (D) SM level in hCMEC/D3 cells upon Aβ 1–42 treatment. (E) Ceramide level in hCMEC/D3 cells upon Aβ 1–42 treatment. (F) The activity of nSMase1 in hCMEC/D3 cells upon Aβ 1–42 treatment. (A–D) n = 3, (E, F) n = 4. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001. The experiments were repeated at least three times. Aβ: Amyloid-β; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; HPLC: high performance liquid chromatography; nSMase1: neutral sphingomyelinase 1; P-gp: P-glycoprotein; SM: sphingomyelin; SMS1: sphingomyelin synthase 1; SMS2: sphingomyelin synthase 2.

    Journal: Neural Regeneration Research

    Article Title: The relationship among amyloid-β deposition, sphingomyelin level, and the expression and function of P-glycoprotein in Alzheimer’s disease pathological process

    doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.358607

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The effect of Aβ 1–42 treatment on SM and P-gp in hCMEC/D3 cells. (A) MTT analysis of hCMEC/D3 cell viability. (B) Western blot analysis of the expressions of P-gp, ezrin, nSMase1, SMS1 and SMS2. (C) HPLC analysis of the intracellular accumulation of rh123 in hCMEC/D3 cells. (D) SM level in hCMEC/D3 cells upon Aβ 1–42 treatment. (E) Ceramide level in hCMEC/D3 cells upon Aβ 1–42 treatment. (F) The activity of nSMase1 in hCMEC/D3 cells upon Aβ 1–42 treatment. (A–D) n = 3, (E, F) n = 4. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001. The experiments were repeated at least three times. Aβ: Amyloid-β; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; HPLC: high performance liquid chromatography; nSMase1: neutral sphingomyelinase 1; P-gp: P-glycoprotein; SM: sphingomyelin; SMS1: sphingomyelin synthase 1; SMS2: sphingomyelin synthase 2.

    Article Snippet: The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat milk (Servicebio, Cat# GC310001-100g) in PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (Servicebio, Cat# GC204002) and then incubated with the following primary antibodies: rabbit monoclonal anti-P-glycoprotein antibody (1:300, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, Cat# ab170904, RRID: AB_2687930), mouse monoclonal anti-ezrin antibody (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 35-7300, RRID: AB_87580), rabbit monoclonal anti-radixin antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Cat# 2636, RRID: AB_2238294), rabbit monoclonal anti-moesin antibody (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# PA5-34666, RRID: AB_2552018), rabbit polyclonal anti-SMS1 antibody (1:1000, Bioss, Cat# bs-4216R, RRID: AB_11111297), rabbit polyclonal anti-SMS2 antibody (1:1000, Bioss, Cat# bs-5694R, RRID: AB_2920897), rabbit polyclonal anti-nSMase1 antibody (1:1000, Bioss, Cat# bs-19472R, RRID: AB_2920898), and rabbit monoclonal anti-GAPDH antibody (1:4000, Beyotime, Cat# AF1186, RRID: AB_2920889).

    Techniques: Western Blot, Activity Assay, High Performance Liquid Chromatography

    The role of nSMase1 in the changes of SM level and P-gp expression and functionality caused by Aβ 1–42 treatment in hCMEC/D3 cells. (A–E) Inhibitory effects of nSMase1 inhibitor GW4869 on the changes of SM metabolism and P-gp expression and functionality. (A) SM level. n = 3. (B) Ceramide level. n = 4. (C) nSMase1 activity. n = 4. (D) Western blot analysis of the expression of nSMase1, P-gp, and ezrin. n = 3. (E) HPLC analysis of the intracellular accumulation of rh123. n = 3. (F) Effects of nSMase1 overexpression on SM metabolism and P-gp expression. Western blot analysis of the expressions of nSMase1, P-gp, and ezrin. n = 3. SM level. n = 3. Ceramide level. n = 5. nSMase1 activity. n = 5. (G) Effects of nSMase1 knockdown on SM metabolism and P-gp expression. Western blot analysis of the expressions of nSMase1, P-gp, and ezrin. n = 3. SM level. n = 3. Ceramide level. n = 5. nSMase1 activity. n = 5. (H) Effects of GW4869 on the changes of P-gp expression and functionality caused by nSMase1 overexpression. Western blot analysis of the expression of P-gp and ezrin. n = 3. HPLC analysis of the intracellular accumulation of rh123. n = 3. (I) Impact of ceramide on the changes of P-gp expression and functionality caused by nSMase1 knockdown. Western blot analysis of the expressions of P-gp and ezrin. n = 3. HPLC analysis of the intracellular accumulation of rh123. n = 3. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. The experiments were repeated at least three times. Aβ: Amyloid-β; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; hCMEC/D3: human cerebral microvascular endothelial; HPLC: high performance liquid chromatography; nSMase1: neutral sphingomyelinase 1; P-gp: P-glycoprotein; SM: sphingomyelin.

    Journal: Neural Regeneration Research

    Article Title: The relationship among amyloid-β deposition, sphingomyelin level, and the expression and function of P-glycoprotein in Alzheimer’s disease pathological process

    doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.358607

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The role of nSMase1 in the changes of SM level and P-gp expression and functionality caused by Aβ 1–42 treatment in hCMEC/D3 cells. (A–E) Inhibitory effects of nSMase1 inhibitor GW4869 on the changes of SM metabolism and P-gp expression and functionality. (A) SM level. n = 3. (B) Ceramide level. n = 4. (C) nSMase1 activity. n = 4. (D) Western blot analysis of the expression of nSMase1, P-gp, and ezrin. n = 3. (E) HPLC analysis of the intracellular accumulation of rh123. n = 3. (F) Effects of nSMase1 overexpression on SM metabolism and P-gp expression. Western blot analysis of the expressions of nSMase1, P-gp, and ezrin. n = 3. SM level. n = 3. Ceramide level. n = 5. nSMase1 activity. n = 5. (G) Effects of nSMase1 knockdown on SM metabolism and P-gp expression. Western blot analysis of the expressions of nSMase1, P-gp, and ezrin. n = 3. SM level. n = 3. Ceramide level. n = 5. nSMase1 activity. n = 5. (H) Effects of GW4869 on the changes of P-gp expression and functionality caused by nSMase1 overexpression. Western blot analysis of the expression of P-gp and ezrin. n = 3. HPLC analysis of the intracellular accumulation of rh123. n = 3. (I) Impact of ceramide on the changes of P-gp expression and functionality caused by nSMase1 knockdown. Western blot analysis of the expressions of P-gp and ezrin. n = 3. HPLC analysis of the intracellular accumulation of rh123. n = 3. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. The experiments were repeated at least three times. Aβ: Amyloid-β; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; hCMEC/D3: human cerebral microvascular endothelial; HPLC: high performance liquid chromatography; nSMase1: neutral sphingomyelinase 1; P-gp: P-glycoprotein; SM: sphingomyelin.

    Article Snippet: The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat milk (Servicebio, Cat# GC310001-100g) in PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (Servicebio, Cat# GC204002) and then incubated with the following primary antibodies: rabbit monoclonal anti-P-glycoprotein antibody (1:300, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, Cat# ab170904, RRID: AB_2687930), mouse monoclonal anti-ezrin antibody (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 35-7300, RRID: AB_87580), rabbit monoclonal anti-radixin antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Cat# 2636, RRID: AB_2238294), rabbit monoclonal anti-moesin antibody (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# PA5-34666, RRID: AB_2552018), rabbit polyclonal anti-SMS1 antibody (1:1000, Bioss, Cat# bs-4216R, RRID: AB_11111297), rabbit polyclonal anti-SMS2 antibody (1:1000, Bioss, Cat# bs-5694R, RRID: AB_2920897), rabbit polyclonal anti-nSMase1 antibody (1:1000, Bioss, Cat# bs-19472R, RRID: AB_2920898), and rabbit monoclonal anti-GAPDH antibody (1:4000, Beyotime, Cat# AF1186, RRID: AB_2920889).

    Techniques: Expressing, Activity Assay, Western Blot, Over Expression, High Performance Liquid Chromatography

    Membrane expression of WT and p.V240M HCN4 channels. Representative WB images ( A ) and densitometric analyses ( B ) of biotinylation assays showing the total (input) or surface (membrane) expression of HCN4 in cells expressing WT or p.V240M channels. The cytosolic protein ezrin was used as a negative control. In B , each dot represents 1 experiment and each bar the mean±SEM of n experiments (biological replicates). Unpaired Student t-test. Figure 6 -source data 1 of panel A. Figure 6 -source data 2 of panel B.

    Journal: medRxiv

    Article Title: A rare gain of function HCN4 gene mutation is responsible for inappropriate sinus tachycardia in a Spanish family

    doi: 10.1101/2023.01.20.23284606

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Membrane expression of WT and p.V240M HCN4 channels. Representative WB images ( A ) and densitometric analyses ( B ) of biotinylation assays showing the total (input) or surface (membrane) expression of HCN4 in cells expressing WT or p.V240M channels. The cytosolic protein ezrin was used as a negative control. In B , each dot represents 1 experiment and each bar the mean±SEM of n experiments (biological replicates). Unpaired Student t-test. Figure 6 -source data 1 of panel A. Figure 6 -source data 2 of panel B.

    Article Snippet: Membranes were then incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-HCN4 (1:1000; 55224-1-AP, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA) and mouse monoclonal anti-ezrin (1:400; ab4069, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) primary antibodies overnight at 4°C.

    Techniques: Expressing, Negative Control